Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Michael,

Quoting Michael Meeks <michael.meeks@suse.com>:


On Tue, 2012-11-13 at 11:49 +0100, Michael Stahl wrote:
>    I guess some include flags changed somewhere :-) still chasing.

boost was added to tail_build recently, so it could possibly be caused
by a missing dependency, i.e. something is built before boost and finds
the system boost headers.

        It seems the problem was a set of missing:

$(eval $(call gb_StaticLibrary_use_unpacked,codemaker,boost))

        Without those we would compile vs. the system boost and then (at some
stage) the real boost would be installed, and we'd then compile other
parts vs. that.

Lessons learned: when some external module is moved to tail_build (or gbuildified for that matter) one test schould be always done: uninstall the corresponding system lib and make clean LO build.

I extended the gbuild'ification documentation:
http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Build_System#Gbuildification_of_dmake_module

[...]
in case of external module:
* uninstall the corresponding system lib to make sure, that LO get built against
gbuild'ified module and not against system lib

Regards
David

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.