On Fri, 2012-11-09 at 06:19 +0100, Lionel Elie Mamane wrote:
On Thu, Nov 08, 2012 at 04:39:22PM +0000, Michael Meeks wrote:
* 4.0 pending tasks
+ should we drop Rhino, Beanshell & javascript in 4.0 ? (Michael)
+ could be turned into an extension
+ was in the past was turned off (Stephan)
AA: + disable Rhino / Beanshell unless in experimental mode (Michael)
+ for future deprecation / removal.
*Why*? Is there some problem with these scripting languages, are they
hard to maintain, ...?
When I last looked at Rhino (an impl. of Javascript in Java) it was
rather under-maintained itself, and as one of those big-lumps-of-java
not the loveliest thing to build, maintain use etc.
IMHO gathering stats on whether anyone uses it is a sensible thing to
do with a view to deprecation; clearly we don't want to pile up
relatively pointless features, and encourage millions of people to
download, install and not-use them for no good reason :-)
At least, this was the thinking around not shipping the Logo stuff
built-in IIRC - good to be consistent.
Sorry the minutes were not terribly clear, nor (IMHO) did we reach a
terribly clear conclusion on the logo topic - which is perhaps all to
the best; it hadn't appeared on the list yet.
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.