Hi,
On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 10:33:56AM +0000, Noel Power wrote:
I found some unreviewed patches of mine and also a patch ( some
commits in the past ) in master that I just wanted to promote for
review in 3.6, it seems that easiest way was to use the mail
interface to ask for a cherry-pick ( or at least I didn't see
anything else appropriate on the wiki ) Is that right, is there no
command line interface to do similar? is there a better way to do
that?
You can do the same with plain git:
git checkout libreoffice-3-6
git cherry-pick foo
git push ssh://logerrit/core HEAD:refs/for/libreoffice-3-6
see http://gerrit.googlecode.com/svn/documentation/2.2.1/user-upload.html for details
Another annoyance is that the owner of the bug in gerrit ( e.g see
https://gerrit.libreoffice.org/#/c/958/ ) is marked as "LibreOffice
gerrit bot" instead of the author of the patch.
Yes, Id like to have that fixed too.
Is this the expected way that things work? or did I just make a mess
of things ( if so would be grateful to know what I should have done
for future reference )
2012-11-01 16:18:38,404 WARNING To ssh://logerrit/core
2012-11-01 16:18:38,404 WARNING ! [remote rejected] HEAD -> refs/for/libreoffice-3-6 (no
changes made)
2012-11-01 16:18:38,404 WARNING error: failed to push some refs to 'ssh://logerrit/core'
2012-11-01 16:18:38,405 ERROR call to "git --work-tree=/tmp/tmpHZMY4L/repo push
ssh://logerrit/core HEAD:refs/for/libreoffice-3-6" returned: 1
It seems to me the cherry-picked change was already on the branch, thus no
commit generated by cherry-picking, thus nothing to upload.
Best,
Bjoern
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.