On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:52 AM, Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud@gmail.com> wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 10:35 AM, Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@suse.cz> wrote:
On Wednesday 31 of October 2012, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 8:34 AM, Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@suse.cz> wrote:
I'd prefer to not bring it back because of a special use case that's
already easily doable as it is.
Well tinderbox works nicely and easily with an autogen.lastrun
associated with a given profile...
messing with env variable is not as neat and is just a pain when
managing many of these profile...
what is the harm of --enable-symbol ?
./configure --enable-symbol
./configure CXXFLAGS='-Os -g'
more complex, not portable, possible quoting issue etc...
but let me turn the question around:
what do we gain by _not_ having --enable-symbol ?
Norbert
Context
- Re: ENABLE_SYMBOLS=true does nothing (continued)
Re: ENABLE_SYMBOLS=true does nothing · David Ostrovsky
CPPUNIT road map, recent changes etc. · John McCabe
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.