Re: optimising OUString for space

On 2012-10-01 14:06, Michael Stahl wrote:
> > Or are you talking about memory management?
> > The current OUString class allocates a new character buffer for every
> > mutation, I assume we'd keep that strategy.
> you mean if i have some string and then add !a" "b" "c" to it it will
> re-allocate 3 times?  that is too expensive.  there needs to be some
> protocol to ensure exclusive ownership of the buffer (which the
> OUStringBuffer has automatically) and then whenever it's out of capacity
> double the allocation.

Ah, I see, you're talking about OUStringBuffer now, not OUString.

Yes, in that case, I imagine we'd store a boolean flag somewhere in the 
structure to indicate that the buffer is read-only.
We could probably steal the high bit of the nCapacity field.

Then, a mutation to OUStringBuffer would cause the data to be copied to 
a new, freshly allocated buffer, and then things would proceed as they 
do currently.

Disclaimer: http://www.peralex.com/disclaimer.html