Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Le Thu, 06 Sep 2012 09:44:28 +0200, Jan Holesovsky <kendy@suse.cz> a écrit:
Hi Mat,

Mat M píše v St 05. 09. 2012 v 23:25 +0200:
But is it normal that ccache on 3.6 branch only uses 3Gb ? I find it very
low, compared to all binary files produced.

Could someone on linux give its ccache stats to compare ?
Kendy, what's your opinion ?

I think the best would be to check the content of your ccache dir, and
see if there are new files appearing there.  You can also look at the
content of the new files, if they look ~reasonably - IIRC I cache even
the stdout/stderr for the dependency output.

I don't have any starts at hand at the moment, but should you need any
more details, please let me know :-)


I think we can close this.
I thought it should be higher because I remembered someone talking about 32 Gb needed, but I think now it was because of debug builds & history.
So my 3Gb are fine and big enough, that's ok.
I don't know if it is related, but workdir is 4,4 Gb for a standard windows build

Thank you all for your answers


--
Mat M

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.