On 24/08/12 12:53, Caolán McNamara wrote:
On Thu, 2012-08-23 at 21:00 +0200, Arnaud Versini wrote:
Hi everyone,
I noticed in the code some annihilation of O[U]String content by using
memset or rtl_zeroMemory directly on the content as a password
security. It breaks encapsulation and the string immutability, not so
good. I think there is four possibilities, in order of my personal
preference ;-) :
1. Don't eradicate the string content, the content remain in RAM
until the string deletion and a new allocation of the area
So, looking at the code that "trashes" the password it doesn't make a
whole pile of sense to me. There's a OUString which is converted to a
OString, and the OString is then mangled with a
rtl_zeroMemory((void*)foo.getStr(), foo.getLength()) after use, but the
original OUString remains. So only the copy gets mangled, not the
original.
well clearly that _is_ just security theater :)
Best IMO to remove the Zeroing. If we want to do this sort of stuff,
we'd really need a single secure password class kind of thing, and use
it consistently, rather than arbitrarily butchering the occasional
OString.
agreed (see my other mail from yesterday for details).
_______________________________________________
LibreOffice mailing list
LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.