that is true for the document that is protected by the password.
but in practice that same password may not only give access to that one
document, but also let an attacker do other nefarious things like log on
to twitter and impersonate the user's cat.
Hmm, but why use password-protected documents only for yourself? No idea,
but isn't it more likely that such documents are passed between *several*
people? Thus making it less likely one would use some important personal
password to protect it? Unless one also wants the other people to be able
to impersonate oneself on twitter etc. But whatever, sure, if there is a
strong feeling that erasing password strings from memory does improve
"security", I am not going to argue any more. Especially as I guess we want
to avoid giving any impression that we would be intentionally weakening
"security", real or not... that would be bad publicity.
--tml
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.