On Thu, Aug 23, 2012 at 8:41 PM, Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com> wrote:
On 23/08/12 18:09, John Smith wrote:
Hi,
I just finished a first full run of lcov. There was one 'make check'
failure though, and there were a lot of 'warnings' running lcov that
may need some further investigation. Also, there is some stuff
included ('/usr/include/boost', for example) that might not be desired
in the report ?
yes, everything under /usr/include is just noise, would be great to
filter that out.
Hrm. Looking at the 'lcov' options now, there seems to be a '--remove
' flag that lets you filter out coverage data for a particular set of
files from a tracefile by specifying a pattern. So I guess that 'lcov
--remove /tmp/libreoffice_total.info /usr/include -o
/tmp//tmp/libreoffice_filtered.info' should do it. I will look into
that one, as soon as 'make build && make check' finally finishes...
Regards,
John Smith.
Context
- Re: Bug 38840 - Adding coverage analysis to unit tests (continued)
- Re: Bug 38840 - Adding coverage analysis to unit tests · John Smith
Re: Bug 38840 - Adding coverage analysis to unit tests · Stephan Bergmann
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.