I did have one test fail. See the 'make check failure' thread:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/make-check-failure-td4002979.html
Could that explain the omission ?
of course it could, i wasn't connecting those threads :)
Thats good. Well then at least that makes me fairly confident that the
results are correct, but others are still invited to take a look
though.
ok then i guess the test wasn't run because of the previous failure; if
that failure happens every time for you, then you can disable the test
locally by commenting out the line sc.ScAccessiblePageHeaderArea in
sc/qa/unoapi/sc.sce and try again.
Thanks, but since the failure of a single test doesnt stop it from
executing any further tests, I think ill leave 'sc/qa/unoapi/sc.sce'
as it is. But if it does fail every time (I have to check, sorry, make
build && make check takes ages on my machine) wouldnt it be a better
idea to investigate (if it isnt just me, of course) what is causing
the failure ?
Regards,
John Smith.
Context
- Re: Bug 38840 - Adding coverage analysis to unit tests (continued)
Re: Bug 38840 - Adding coverage analysis to unit tests · Stephan Bergmann
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.