On Thu, Aug 9, 2012 at 7:04 AM, Bjoern Michaelsen
<bjoern.michaelsen@canonical.com> wrote:
On Wed, Aug 08, 2012 at 11:52:03PM +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
Like described in link above, you have three options here:
pypi-system-wide, pypi-user-local and distro package.
No other options please.
Most people wont even know what pypi-system-wide is and dont want to know. And
they shouldnt need to.
We will loose possible contributors that way. Not an option. Patch submittal
has to work hasslefree and out of the box. This is really critical: there has
to be no extra step at all for patch submittal otherwise we failed.
Thinking a bit about this, another possibility would be to do with git-review
as we do with other external stuff:
Downloading and installing a local copy in "./download". That would ensure it
to be universally available and be up to date.
I know that michael disagree with me on that, but I prefer dev-tools
to be in ... dev-tools.git
one can install it as he see fit. and you get the version you
want/need regardless where you are in the source tree...
Norbert
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.