Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Nico,

        So - firstly, thanks for your work - it's great to have an improved
structure for the autocompletion data; as you say there are a number of
nasty performance problems & self-inflicted wounds there.

On Sat, 2012-07-21 at 00:39 +0000, Nico Weyand wrote:
Well, in that case, I'm officially stating that the code I've
committed (and all future code I am going to commit) may be used under
LGPLv3+ (If I've understood it correctly, only one of both the
licenses you named is required and I do prefer LGPL over MPL).

        We require a dual license: MPL/LGPLv3+ statement. We understand if you
don't want to make that, but then including this one change has a big
impact on the licensing of our code base.

        The ideal is to get a clean blanket statement (as above) and link you
into:

        http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Developers

        Thanks !

                Michael.

-- 
michael.meeks@suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.