On Tue, 2012-07-17 at 09:11 +0200, Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 10:52:04AM +0100, Michael Meeks wrote:
    Right; that's so. Of course, in some languages eg. C# you can bind to
that with a delegate requiring no function definition ;-)
I wonder what you mean C# can do what at least C++11 can not: With it you
easily bind member functions (and also lambdas).
        Sorry pardon, I mean C# which exists in a standardised and deployed
form for many years can do this easily; whereas C++11 which is a living
nightmare for cross-platform developers - also allows it ;->
        But yes - having an 'event' IDL construct, and pleasant bindings that
will allow lambdas to be used as well as/when we can use C++11 would be
really extremely pleasant :-)
        ATB,
                Michael.
-- 
michael.meeks@suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
- Re: shiny uno version, Desktop IDL (continued)
 
  Re: shiny uno version, Desktop IDL · Michael Stahl
  Re: shiny uno version, Desktop IDL · Stephan Bergmann
   
 
  Privacy Policy |
  
Impressum (Legal Info) |
  
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
  on this website are licensed under the
  
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
  This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
  licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
  "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
  registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
  in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
  logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
  thereof is explained in our 
trademark policy.