On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:53:24PM -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
On Mon, Jul 16, 2012 at 12:35 PM, János Uray <uray.janos@gmail.com> wrote:
Thank you.
It's not a happy answer though.
I hoped that there are at least some little features in the intersection of
the C++11-knowledge of the supported compilers.
The most problematic ones are the gcc compiler used on Mac OS X (gcc
4.0?), and MSVC 2008 compilers.
gcc started implementing C++11 with 4.3, MSVC started relevant partial support
with 10.0/11.0.
If you (or someone else equally
interested) are willing to research those two compilers to see what
subset of C++11 features they support (if at all), then I don't see
why we shouldn't use those features.
Not even a subset, I fear. Also note the "gcc C++11 ABI is not guaranteed to be
C++03 compatible" discussion in the ESC minutes: there are more traps lurking here.
Best,
Bjoern
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.