On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 09:59:57AM +0200, Miklos Vajna <vmiklos@suse.cz> wrote:
Anyway, this is the first time I tried to use logerrit review, and I
found 3 issues. The generated commandline should be like:
ssh logerrit gerrit review -m \"looks good\" --verified=+1 --code-review=2
1080c131c0c512a9d5273e860a48af13667bc9e8
But logerrit:
- prints " instead of \"
- uses codereview insead of code-review (who tested this? ;) )
- tries to use the changeid instead of the sha1 of the commit
The first two is trivial and I fixed it, the last one is something I'm
not sure about - Norbert/Björn, care to have a look? The error message
is:
fatal: "I7605eda6ef8111612ceb1ded79c0811de9ca7b25" is not a valid patch set
Just getting the sha1 from FETCH_HEAD is what I did manually for now,
but that's not a solution - if I gerrit-cherry-pick two independent
patches, then I have no idea how to get the original sha1 for the first
one, unless we make gerrit-cherry-pick use git cherry-pick -x.
Hi Björn,
I want to point out that this is still an issue:
~/git/libreoffice/libreoffice-3-5$ ../master/logerrit review
no Change-Id given on the command line, reviewing change I3fa331d246160935f4feed21de69f9ec0c2e9994
was the change verified to build sucessfully (+) or found not to build (-) or none of that ()? +
is the code looking good (+), bad (-) or none of that ()? +
do you approve the change (+) too, or prefer someone else to do that ()? +
please type a friendly comment: looks ok
ssh logerrit gerrit review -m \"looks ok\" --verified=+1 --code-review=2
I3fa331d246160935f4feed21de69f9ec0c2e9994
~/git/libreoffice/libreoffice-3-5$ ssh logerrit gerrit review -m \"looks ok\" --verified=+1
--code-review=2 I3fa331d246160935f4feed21de69f9ec0c2e9994
fatal: "I3fa331d246160935f4feed21de69f9ec0c2e9994" is not a valid patch set
~/git/libreoffice/libreoffice-3-5$ cat .git/FETCH_HEAD
281f3ec0a105175fb41e2b0455042fd29c7dc069 'refs/changes/57/257/1' of
ssh://logerrit/core
~/git/libreoffice/libreoffice-3-5$ ssh logerrit gerrit review -m \"looks ok\" --verified=+1
--code-review=2 281f3ec0a105175fb41e2b0455042fd29c7dc069
(i.e. no error with the sha1, but still no idea how to get the original
sha1, in case i cherry-picked two change for review.)
Thanks for looking at it,
Miklos
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.