Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


I guess with all of this said my question still is, should I mark the bug report as WONTFIX and just have a comment why? It seems like enabling by default isn't the way to go and the time/energy it would take to add a language check might just be too much for a bug that affects such a limited number of users....especially when there is an easy workaround (enable CTL in the options). I have never used it before so I can't even say I knew anything that it was used for until this thread, shows my ignorance.

Let me know and I'll pass on the message to the user (or someone else can throw a comment in the bug if you'd like).

Thanks,
Joel


On 06/18/2012 07:02 AM, Eike Rathke wrote:
Hi Khaled,

On Monday, 2012-06-18 13:39:03 +0200, Khaled Hosny wrote:

IMO CTL/Asian options is a remnants of distant past
Yes, it is ...

and should be
killed for good (not to mention that "Asian" is a so ignorant
orientalistic term in this context).
... but it is something that MS bestowed us and even persists in file
formats.

   Eike



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.