bfo.bugmail@spamgourmet.com píše v Čt 24. 05. 2012 v 21:20 +0200:
On Wed, May 23, 2012 at 3:11 PM, Petr Mladek - pmladek@suse.cz wrote:Please consider. Always you can ask the friendly guys at Mozilla how to set this all up...Thanks for tip.What a discovery! Seems like complete how to: http://zenit.senecac.on.ca/wiki/index.php/Mozilla_Source_and_Symbol_Server Blog postings, bugs on b.m.o, other resources also worth of checking: http://crashopensource.wordpress.com/2007/09/20/starting-the-project-mozilla-source-and-symbol-server/ https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=385792 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=408134 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=419904 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424240 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=424817 https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=428518 http://web.archive.org/web/20071218162257/http://www.jorgon.freeserve.co.uk/Other/pdb.htm
Great catch. Now we need to find a volunteer who would work on this. I have put it into bugzilla and added flags for the "EasyHacks" pages. See https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=50350
It would be great if ESC could go the Mozilla's path of doing things in QA department. The knowledge base is on Mozilla's wiki. Software is... open sourced and available to download. You should get connected to make LO better. Definitely.
We are already using Litmus and are going to migrate to Moztrap. Though, we are not familiar with the real processes that used in the Mozilla project. Do you have any experience with the Mozilla processes? Are you able to compare it with the current LibreOffice processes that are described at http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/QA ? This is the area where we really need improvements. It would be great if you could join us and discus particular changes on the libreoffice-qa mailing list. Best Regards, Petr