On Thu, May 24, 2012 at 2:47 AM, Caolán McNamara <caolanm@redhat.com> wrote:
On Wed, 2012-05-23 at 15:56 -0400, Kohei Yoshida wrote:
Thanks. What about this one?
http://opengrok.libreoffice.org/xref/core/filter/source/config/fragments/filters/StarWriter_DOS.xcu
Does the same thinking apply to this one also? I hope yes.
The "import excel .xls into a word processor" filters are just odd in
the first place. But the StarWriter for DOS filter presumably makes as
much sense as any of the rest of the binfilter filters. What singles
StarWriter DOS out as problematic as opposed to say StarWriter 1.0 ?
It's associated with the writer_StarWriter_DOS format type which uses
.txt as the only extension. So, it gets prioritized when dealing with
a plain text file with.txt extension even though it's a binary format.
I find that a bit odd.
Kohei
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.