Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 02:37:30AM -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Mon, May 21, 2012 at 1:52 AM, David Ostrovsky <david.ostrovsky@gmx.de> wrote:
Hi,

with help of David T. Stephan and Matúš this branch can be merged to master.
It would be really nice, if some of you with win & mac could test it.
If we do not hear anything withing 2 days we would merge it to master anyway
;-)

As I mentionned to dtardon earlier,
due to the number of such gebuild feature branch (half a dozen or so),
it would be nice to merge them all on a 'meta' feature branch where
merge conflict, and otehr kink can be ironed-out and tested and all
platforms.. and _then_ get it to master.

Yes, and I plan to do that for the three of my branches. But
feature/gbuild_testtools is not a big change, compared to the others, is
based on pretty recent master (testtools does not change much anyway),
so I would allow it to go directly to master. But I will listen to
counterarguments, e.g., it is possible people (especially those not
using Linux/x86_64) do not have the time or processing power to test
more than one branch. That would be a good reason for merging all the
pending conversions onto one branch.

D.

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.