On 05/18/2012 05:53 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
for this reason i'm in favor of immediately dropping support for
anything older than Java 1.5 on master, and also on libreoffice-3-5.
(i don't actually know what our "official" Java baseline is, perhaps it
is already 1.5?)
+1 on requiring a baseline of Java 1.5.  Not sure if anybody ever 
bothered to explicitly specify a Java baseline for LO, but Java 1.5 
would apparently be in line with old OOo, see 
<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=92032> "Increase Java 
minimum version to 1.5 in jvmfwk."  (My memory told me that old OOo had 
still been at Java 1.4, but my memory was apparently wrong there.  The 
only potential gotcha would be that if you write extensions that shall 
be compatible with really old OOo, you would need to compile with really 
old javac -- but who cares.)
the attached (uncommitted) patch changes codemaker to produce class
files in version 49, supported by JREs 1.5 or later, effectively raising
the baseline to Java 1.5 (if it is not there already).
So I'd say, apply that to both master and libreoffice-3-5 (i.e., you can 
use my sign-off for the latter).
Stephan
Context
   
 
  Privacy Policy |
  
Impressum (Legal Info) |
  
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
  on this website are licensed under the
  
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
  This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
  licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
  "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
  registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
  in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
  logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
  thereof is explained in our 
trademark policy.