On 05/18/2012 05:53 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
for this reason i'm in favor of immediately dropping support for
anything older than Java 1.5 on master, and also on libreoffice-3-5.
(i don't actually know what our "official" Java baseline is, perhaps it
is already 1.5?)
+1 on requiring a baseline of Java 1.5. Not sure if anybody ever
bothered to explicitly specify a Java baseline for LO, but Java 1.5
would apparently be in line with old OOo, see
<https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=92032> "Increase Java
minimum version to 1.5 in jvmfwk." (My memory told me that old OOo had
still been at Java 1.4, but my memory was apparently wrong there. The
only potential gotcha would be that if you write extensions that shall
be compatible with really old OOo, you would need to compile with really
old javac -- but who cares.)
the attached (uncommitted) patch changes codemaker to produce class
files in version 49, supported by JREs 1.5 or later, effectively raising
the baseline to Java 1.5 (if it is not there already).
So I'd say, apply that to both master and libreoffice-3-5 (i.e., you can
use my sign-off for the latter).
Stephan
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.