Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 05/18/2012 05:53 PM, Michael Stahl wrote:
for this reason i'm in favor of immediately dropping support for
anything older than Java 1.5 on master, and also on libreoffice-3-5.
(i don't actually know what our "official" Java baseline is, perhaps it
is already 1.5?)

+1 on requiring a baseline of Java 1.5. Not sure if anybody ever bothered to explicitly specify a Java baseline for LO, but Java 1.5 would apparently be in line with old OOo, see <https://issues.apache.org/ooo/show_bug.cgi?id=92032> "Increase Java minimum version to 1.5 in jvmfwk." (My memory told me that old OOo had still been at Java 1.4, but my memory was apparently wrong there. The only potential gotcha would be that if you write extensions that shall be compatible with really old OOo, you would need to compile with really old javac -- but who cares.)

the attached (uncommitted) patch changes codemaker to produce class
files in version 49, supported by JREs 1.5 or later, effectively raising
the baseline to Java 1.5 (if it is not there already).

So I'd say, apply that to both master and libreoffice-3-5 (i.e., you can use my sign-off for the latter).

Stephan

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.