On Mon, 2012-05-14 at 15:24 +0100, Caolán McNamara wrote:
I think it looks pretty good now anyway FWIW, I'd initially wanted to
build up an incremental chain, but knew I wouldn't get (even the simple
case) right in any reasonable length of time. Glad I didn't try given
the "busted storages, but we happen to stick to the fairly ok bits when
reading" case :-)
:-)
I don't know of any specific other examples outside of the existing
"special" ole2 cases we have in the regression tests. At least
collecting those together as cppunit tests has had some some payoff.
Yep - having the test harness there was a Godsend for writing the
backwards reading / directory traversal test :-)
Pushed to -3-5 with your sign-off.
Thanks,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.