Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index



On Sun, 2012-05-13 at 12:57 +0200, Rainer Bielefeld wrote:
I did a quick query concerning LibO Bugs with "somehow patch" 
attachments [1] and still UNFIXED, hat might show that these patches 
still wait for review or something else went wrong

What shell we do with these 60 bugs?

        Yep - so; I reviewed all the outstanding bugs with a 'patch' boolean
set to true/1 - and the majority are patches that were abhortive /
proof-of-concept / and shouldn't be merged. I guess I should prolly have
flagged them with some 'notpatch' keyword ;-) or adjusted them in some
way. I pushed the real ones to the mailing list and/or merged / closed
them.

        The real trick is to push new patch bugs to the dev. list I think
and/or thoughts on how to annotate / improve the query appreciated.

        I also didn't quest for patches that were not marked as such but files
ending '.diff' or '.patch' - perhaps there are some there (if there is
an easy-to-use query for me to review those that'd be great ;-).

        Thanks,

                Michael.

-- 
michael.meeks@suse.com  <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.