Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 04/13/2012 11:35 AM, Noel Grandin wrote:
On 2012-04-12 14:40, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Insist on people compiling with an unbroken toolchain instead?


It looks like Fedora is also going to do this:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/ChangeInImplicitDSOLinking

No, as already detailed by Michael.

I'm willing to write a configure test to add the --no-as-needed flag if
someone can point me in the right direction.
I can follow the configure.in syntax easily enough, but what would be
the easiest way to test for the fact that the linker is defaulting to
--as-needed?

I would still prefer to simply insist on Ubuntu fixing their tool chain. <http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Writing_warning-free_code#When_all_else_fails> "NOTE: The ld --as-needed default was reverted for the final natty release, and will be re-enabled in the o-series." This at least seems to indicate that Ubuntu is aware their move is not without problems. Noel, do you happen to be affected because you are on a pre-final natty release (whatever that is)?

Björn, do you know anything about this Ubuntu-specific thing, or anyone within Ubuntu we could discuss that with?

Stephan

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.