On Thursday 12 of April 2012, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Thu, Apr 12, 2012 at 7:14 AM, Noel Grandin <noel@peralex.com> wrote:
So finally (about 3 months later than expected) I've got the tinderbox I
promised up and running at my company (Peralex).
Great :-)
On 2012-04-12 13:55, Lubos Lunak wrote:
It happens automatically with -m all . At least it did with my
tinderbox.
Should I be using the tinbuild or the tinbuild2 script?
tinbuild2
Shouldn't the (obsolete I assume) tinbuild be simply removed in the
repository?
Please see : http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/Tinderbox
and update it as needed.
and don't forget README.tinbuild2 in the buildbot repo :-)
I did not forget README.tinbuild2 in the case of my tinderbox, but I've never
heard about that wiki page until now.
--
Lubos Lunak
l.lunak@suse.cz
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.