Re: [GBUILD] Can we get rid of recursively invoking custom targets ?

Matúš Kukan <matus.kukan -AT- gmail.com>
Mon, 9 Apr 2012 21:57:35 +0200

On 20 March 2012 11:17, Michael Stahl <mstahl@redhat.com> wrote:

i think nobody really likes the way custom targets are currently
implemented, and iirc Bjoern even denies being responsible for the design :)


So - I re-implemented them.
Hopefully it's now better and I did not break too much along the way.

With 
http://cgit.freedesktop.org/libreoffice/core/commit/?id=0a45deba2be4a77db7540bd050b25bd6c26d7513
there is no more room for custom-target packages.
Also gbuild_simple.mk is gone.

Best,
Matus

ps: this goes also to the list. Sorry, Michael, for first version
accidentally sent only to you.

Context

[GBUILD] Can we get rid of gbuild_simple ? · Matúš Kukan
- Re: [GBUILD] Can we get rid of gbuild_simple ? · Stephan Bergmann
  - Re: [GBUILD] Can we get rid of gbuild_simple ? · Tor Lillqvist
- Re: [GBUILD] Can we get rid of recursively invoking custom targets ? · Michael Stahl
  - Re: [GBUILD] Can we get rid of recursively invoking custom targets ? · Matúš Kukan
    - Re: [GBUILD] Can we get rid of recursively invoking custom targets ? · Matúš Kukan
      - Re: [GBUILD] Can we get rid of recursively invoking custom targets ? · Norbert Thiebaud
  - Re: [GBUILD] Can we get rid of recursively invoking custom targets ? · Matúš Kukan

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.