Re: [PATCH] [PUSHED] Windows lcms2 library import fix

Tor Lillqvist <tml -AT- iki.fi>

Mon, 19 Mar 2012 11:30:42 +0200

So should the CMS_DLL thing in the patch be done just for MSVC then? Or would it be cleaner to just patch out the use of stdcall completely instead? We don't promise that our build of the lsmc2 dll would be binary compatible with anybody else's build of it, do we? (Which is why we should use a more unique name for it, of course... to avoid clashes with potential other installations of a lcms2.dll with different API or ABI.) --tml

Context

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.