Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 02/05/2012 04:28 PM, Dag Wieers wrote:
On Fri, 3 Feb 2012, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Apart from that, Dag, the only safe solution, in principle, is to use
a version of LO that is specificially built for the machine it is run
on (i.e., use a LO installation provided by the respective distro).

I agree, up to the point that I am mostly interested in RHEL5 and RHEL6
and that would mean... ... OpenOffice 3.1.1 or 3.2.1 :-/

But in general the official RPM packages work fine, and I think there's
a benefit in keeping this working (if practical possible).

Yes, I agree with all of that. If we don't get --without-system-stdlibs into 3.5.0 final, maybe you can manage to get the two libs removed after installation (like give your customers a script that does that)? Not a perfect solution, of course.

PS I am at FOSDEM and missed you twice at the booth. Can I offer a free
beer for your help ? :)

Oh what a shame.  But thanks for the kind offer.

Stephan

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.