Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2012 Archives by date, by thread · List index


On 01/13/2012 04:35 PM, Winfried Donkers wrote:
However, I would prefer improving configmgr (if need be) over switching
the label data to yet another format.

What format are you thinking of? As I am doing a lot of rework on the file (the diff file is 1.2MB),
it may  the the right moment to change the format. The current format does not look efficient to me.

Note that it was Micheal who brought up the idea of another format ("use a different format / chunk of code for label descriptions"), not me. I rather argue not to bring in another format (i.e., something different from the current XML .xcu format that is made available to LO via configmgr).

What do you mean with "The current format does not look efficient to me." Efficient in terms of what? And with "format," do you mean the specific .xcs schema to describe labels in the XML .xcu format, or using the XML .xcu format at all for those labels?

Stephan

Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.