On 06/01/12 14:24, Tor Lillqvist wrote:
in the case of pdfimport, isn't there a potential licensing problem
because it uses GPL-licensed xpdf/poppler code?
Ah OK. IANAL, so maybe indeed keeping it as an oxt then is relevant.
Still, what prevents us from saying that a particular build of this
"extension" as shipped with LO x.y, works only with LO x.y?
if it's that closely coupled to a particular version, then claiming it's
an extension is just an exercise in deceptive advertising.
either don't link against unstable LO libs, or stop shipping it as an
extension.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.