Re: [Libreoffice] unnecessary building basegfx twice ?

Stephan Bergmann <sbergman -AT- redhat.com>
Fri, 06 Jan 2012 12:15:23 +0100

On 01/06/2012 12:05 PM, Matúš Kukan wrote:

I'm wondering if we really need to build source files from basegfx twice,
for shared and also static library.
The static library is used only in sdext/source/pdfimport/makefile.mk
and is there from beginning, so maybe there is a reason ?

Maybe extensions can't be linked against our libraries ?

Exactly. Extensions must only use the stable URE interface, not theephemeral LO innards.

Maybe the easiest way out would be to turn pdfimport from an .oxtextension into an (optionally installable) part of LO.


Stephan

Context

[Libreoffice] unnecessary building basegfx twice ? · Matúš Kukan
- Re: [Libreoffice] unnecessary building basegfx twice ? · Stephan Bergmann
  - Re: [Libreoffice] unnecessary building basegfx twice ? · Tor Lillqvist
    - Re: [Libreoffice] unnecessary building basegfx twice ? · Michael Stahl
      - Re: [Libreoffice] unnecessary building basegfx twice ? · Tor Lillqvist
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] unnecessary building basegfx twice ? · Fridrich Strba
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] unnecessary building basegfx twice ? · Stephan Bergmann
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] unnecessary building basegfx twice ? · Michael Stahl
      - Re: [Libreoffice] unnecessary building basegfx twice ? · Michael Meeks
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] unnecessary building basegfx twice ? · Thorsten Behrens
      - Re: [Libreoffice] unnecessary building basegfx twice ? · Lubos Lunak
        
        Re: [Libreoffice] unnecessary building basegfx twice ? · Thorsten Behrens

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.