Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi all,

report from first day (=yesterday)
(In the train now on my way for the second one)

Two tracks
- - - - - -
This ODF plugfest is organised roughly in two tracks:
- international, where the ODF supporting office programs exchange;
- national, where Dutch and Belgium firms that have software for ODF document creation (e.g. for public administrations) show their work and do tests via Officeshots, where the ODF output can be compared in LibreOffice, OpenOffice.org, MsOffice, Calligra, Abiword, GoogelDocs, ..


The presentation about ODF in LibreOffice.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
The presentation went pretty well.
Though I had not spent enough time to be able to show all details of the features involved, most was pretty clear.
Of course I got great support van die lieve meneer Fridirch.
(I'll add the presentation to the wiki later today)

About the workflow from idea for a new feature, to implementing to proposal for the OASIS TC, there was the remark that it can be important that ideas are shared with developers in other projects. Which IMO is true, but I expect that in reality that is already practice since people lurk on each others dev lists?
Well, that will not work for all projects of course.


Tests via Officeshorts
- - - - - - - - - - - -
Though I've not been there all the time, the results that I saw were all very positive for LibreOffice.


ODF specs modular?
- - - - - - - - -
There was some discussion on the way ODF is organised and the possible benefits from a modular specification - which would make it easier /faster to decide on new versions of certain modules.
From what I understood, IBM is looking at that/or working on a proposal.


Contacts about TDF/LibreOffice.
- - - - - - - - -  - - - - - - - - -
I had the opportunity to explain to some interested people the structure of TDF. members, membership committee, board of directors, advisory board, ESC, and other teams, such as UX, QA, l10n, documentation etc.

Also there was interest in how it works to get ones needs (for features) on the agenda of the developers. If there is any voting involved, who sets priorities, ... So that was a good opportunity to explain the way we work: do the coding yourself (and you get lots of great support for that) or make sure that other developers are interested in it, which can be done in several ways, of which sponsoring and support contracts are two important ones.

I spoke with someone from a company that uses LibreOffice in a document-production server. First they were glad with the significant improved stability compared with the old OpenOffice.org (which confirms reports that I got from a Dutch business partner). In the past that firm did look at the possibilities to contribute to the (old) project, but decided that is was too complicated. SO I explained that it's relatively easy now, and that there is a great hackers community with people able and willing to help.
So that contact will be continued.

Cheers,

--
 - Cor
 - http://nl.libreoffice.org


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.