On Wed, 2011-11-09 at 18:05 -0500, Andrew Douglas Pitonyak wrote:
I assume that this would check for an array as well.
I would feel safer if pointers were set to NULL (or nullptr if we
support C++11) since it is not safe to delete a pointer twice.
?, convert all delete to e.g. DELETEZ, i.e. delete foo, foo = NULL ?
Wouldn't be a fan of that, c++ is the language that it is, need to live
with that and not try and make it something that it isn't.
C.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.