On 11/08/2011 10:29 PM, Stephan Bergmann wrote:
Given that SolidMarkHandles is listed in com.sun.star.text.ViewSettings,
it is unclear to me whether it should indeed be removed?
From private replies I received, I gather that the above was probably
not phrased clearly enough to get my point across. Let me rephrase:
"As class SwXViewSettings (sw/source/ui/uno/unomod.cxx) claims it
supports UNO service com.sun.star.text.ViewSettings, and that
published service contains a SolidMarkHandles property, I do not think
it is sound to remove support for it from SwXViewSettings towards LibO
3.5 (instead of, say, a potentially incompatible LibO 4)."
An alternative, if SolidMarkHandles is really useless, bogus, and---with
sufficiently high probability---not used by any external clients, would
be to remove it from the published UNO API for LibO 3.5 (making it
technically incompatible, but in a way that---hopefully---nobody
notices). I gather that this alternative is already discussed (off this
list) and that Tim's patch posted to this thread would just achieve that.
Stephan
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.