On Mon, 2011-10-24 at 20:38 +0200, Eike Rathke wrote:
However, the naming question remains for future functions not (yet)
defined by ODF.
Quite.
Certainly it should not be ORG.OPENOFFICE.FOO, IMHO it should be
ORG.LIBREOFFICE.FOO instead of ORG.DOCUMENTFOUNDATION.FOO, i.e.
specify the implementation.
I hope we are talking file-format issues here, not user presentation.
If there is only one 'FRAC' function, I would expect us to render it as
'FRAC' in the UI, and simply mangle it internally on parse / export - is
that what you're proposing ?. Clearly if there are several alternatives
offering the most interoperable in the UI, and allowing some hideous
specification of the precise one if unavoidable might be good (?).
But of course, it'd be nice to see some org.libreoffice goodness :-)
ATB,
Michael.
--
michael.meeks@suse.com <><, Pseudo Engineer, itinerant idiot
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.