Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Michael, Rainer,

Doing some preparations for Paris, I see there is a discrepancy between the program on the website and the one in the spreadsheet, that can be downloaded.

The website mentions Michael to do the QA session on Friday morning.
The spreadsheet mentions me.
I did not apply - I remember that Michael suggested the possibility.
It's not that I feel not capable to hold a talk/session. However, I have not prepared anything and have hardly been able to do any QA work for the past 5+ weeks. And usually it also are ad hoc contributions that I make.

So talking about "Improving the Development / QA cycle" ... I feel I do not have enough real knowledge. I can ask the same questions of course, as done on the list: present the same view, insight in factors that play a role in the process. However for many of those factors/areas I lack enough detailed knowledge to give some solid ground to a discussion, IMO, other then if then else then. If people are glad with some general overview and points at the QA and the dev side that need consideration and at best some harmonisation (apart from the extra hands that are welcome of course) ... well, OK. But then Rainer would be at least as good as me for that?

So what do you think?

Cheers,


--
 - Cor
 - http://nl.libreoffice.org


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.