On Tue, 2011-09-20 at 20:06 -0500, Norbert Thiebaud wrote:
On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 7:42 PM, Kohei Yoshida <kohei.yoshida@gmail.com> wrote:
What I like about ant is that you don't need to list every single java
source file you need to compile, whereas in make you do (unless I'm
missing something). That makes a huge difference and makes the ant
build script very small regardless of the number of source files.
That is true. Fortunately some of the piece we are talking about (like
the java stuff in scripting for instance) hardly every change.
the scripting/java directory has seen 23 commit in 3 1/2 years, only 2
of them having a possible impact on the build (as in adding/removing
java files)
So that negative point may not be that much of a hurdle.
That is certainly true. Then I'll be okay with the removal of ant on
those modules.
I haven't
checked for other modules, and I certainly agree that for
java-extensions and external java module like tomcat we probably don't
want to go that route...
Yup. But wow, isn't tomcat a http server? What do we even use tomcat
for? ;-)
Kohei
--
Kohei Yoshida, LibreOffice hacker, Calc
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.