On Tue, Sep 20, 2011 at 6:02 PM, Kohei Yoshida <kohei.yoshida@gmail.com> wrote:
Well, if ant is used to build Java jar packages, then, I would prefer
ant be used because ant's build script is much simpler than make's for
Java packages. For Java, ant is pretty much the standard build
system.
The problem is 'ant' need to be treated as a 'Custom Build' and
parallelism cannot be managed properly. (iow the ant process would
have to be the equivalent of -j1).
Norbert
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.