On Mon, Sep 19, 2011 at 5:59 PM, Markus Mohrhard
<markus.mohrhard@googlemail.com> wrote:
Hello Bjoern,
Opinions?
I personally like that idea very much but have one little suggestion. We
should run the tinderboxs with this make target if they don't already use
the check target. That would ensure that even when someone did not run the
unit tests before pushing he gets a little notice.
There is a difference between allowing for a fast make _while_ coding,
and another to push stuff without bothering to run the unit-tests...
Tinderbox are the second line of defense... the first line of defense
is for each dev to make sure that his changes -- at least -- don't
break his own build.
iow shit happens, but that's no reason to encourage it...
Norbert
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.