Re: [Libreoffice] [PATCH] gbuild conversions

On Sun, 18 Sep 2011, Michael Stahl wrote:
> hmmm, there are quite a few such tests; if they weren't run in the old
> build system then they most likely don't run and in many cases don't
> build.  finding out whether any of these are salvageable and can be turned
> into something useful is a task best done separately from gbuild conversion.

I'll just leave the dmake makefiles then.

> this is probably unnecessary; the makefile.mk apparently disabled linking
> against STLport, but LO got rid of STLport in the meantime and so we get
> libstdc++ automatically just by using g++ as linker.

I'll remove that bit.

> please don't remove the dependencies, that makes it impossible to build
> just this module from scratch (in the unlikely case that anybody would
> want to do that...).

I guess I misread tail_build/README. I'll add the dependencies back.


Peter