On Tue, 2011-09-13 at 08:26 +0200, Cor Nouws wrote:
Hope I have made my concerns a bit more clear now.
Not really, I'm probably in the same boat as Kohei and somewhat confused
by the whole thread. Maybe we need *shorter* emails that don't try to be
polite ;-) Problem at the top, proposed solutions afterwards.
"I think 3-5 will be a crap release because there's too many changes
that I don't think we'll be able to test between now and release", is
that the summary ? or "I believe 3-4 was a crap release because of X, Y
and Z, I think we can avoid that by D".
I never felt we got specifics on the "3-4 was bad". I'm not saying it
was awesome, just to hard to get a handle on something nebulous. One
possibility is that it was stuff like the dictionary-upgrade failure on
windows. That was pretty gruesome I suppose. So to try and avoid
getting caught by windows-specific bugs we are now making windows
dailies available. That should help on that front anyway.
C.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.