Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index 

On 09/11/2011 01:27 PM, Pierre-André Jacquod wrote:

What's the best thing to do :
- to keep objective C++ parts ?
- to replace objective C++ by plain (with or without boost) C++ ?


for me there are already too many languages and flavour of languages. I
would stay with plain C++, not adding objective C++ on top
In the Mac OS X specific code parts, we do need Objective C code, to interface the relevant Mac APIs. 

-Stephan

Context

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.