Hello,
I got this comment of a cppcheck developper :
is this objective c++? Can the code be replaced in the tokenizer
with plain C++ somehow?
He seems to be right about objective C++. Then I made a opengrok research, 4
files use "@try". Perhaps, there are other files which use "@ expression",
since @try and @catch are not the only "@ expressions".
What's the best thing to do :
- to keep objective C++ parts ?
- to replace objective C++ by plain (with or without boost) C++ ?
Julien.
--
View this message in context:
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/Cppcheck-defect-when-is-present-tp3324103p3326563.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.