On Sat, Sep 10, 2011 at 12:52 AM, Korrawit Pruegsanusak
<detective.conan.1412@gmail.com> wrote:
Hello all,
On Fri, Sep 9, 2011 at 14:03, Fridrich Strba
<fridrich.strba@graduateinstitute.ch> wrote:
On Fri, 2011-09-09 at 07:23 +0200, Herbert Duerr wrote:
getting rid of the related UNO API would also be a good idea if there
wasn't the "UNO API semper fi" mantra.
No such mantra in the LibreOffice world I guess :)
So sorry for my stupid question, but could someone please point out
what should be done next? I'm quite new here. Thanks :)
Well, from what I read in this thread:
The immediate problem has been tweaked and a fix has been pushed..
The wider question of the 'sanity' of the related UNO API is probably
a topic for http://wiki.documentfoundation.org/Development/LibreOffice4
Norbert
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.