Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index 

The question is, is the below patch (which makes that subsequentcheck 
failure go away) right in adapting the failing test to the new code, or 
does this failure actually uncover unwanted side effects of the new code 
(I'm esp. unsure about changing "A. 1." to "A 1")?


The approach is too simple. The first problem is that the level separator is not necessarily a "." 
(and is configurable at each level in other word processors). Also, while it is understandable in 
the case described it is not necessarily the desired always especially for lists with multiple 
levels. When in the configuration options of a list there should be a toggle for whether to remove 
the final list level separation suffix in references. I don't see removing internal separators (or 
level prefix) and I can see that sometime a user might not want the trailing suffix removed.

Neil Leathers

Context

Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.