Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Marco wrote:
It seems that I have passed the final evaluation!! :)

Indeed - congrats, well done! :)

I attached a new patch set based on the master branch, as it was on
Monday July 7, that includes a bug fix: in my haste I missed to
make animations on the starting slide work properly.

Since all patches from your tarbomb except
0019-Fixed-a-bug-in-the-JavaScript-animation-engi-filters.patch are
pushed, it's easier to just attach that - permits convenient inline
commenting ... ;)

diff --git a/filter/source/svg/svgscript.hxx b/filter/source/svg/svgscript.hxx
index 7cbed89..01748e7 100644
--- a/filter/source/svg/svgscript.hxx
+++ b/filter/source/svg/svgscript.hxx
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@ static const char aSVGScript0[] =
 "<![CDATA[\n\
 \n\
      /*****  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  *****\n\
-      *                      - Presentation Engine v5.0.1 -                       *\n\
+      *                      - Presentation Engine v5.0.2 -                       *\n\
       *****  * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * *  *****/\n\

that looks like mostly noise to me - I can get history from git just
as well. :)

@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@ static const char aSVGScript0[] =
 \n\
      /*****  ******************************************************************\n\
       *\n\
-      *   DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES OR THIS FILE HEADER.\n\
+      *   DO NOT ALTER OR REMOVE COPYRIGHT NOTICES.\n\
       *\n\

I feel very uncomfortable with changing copyright notices on a whim
- especially with a patch that says nothing about it in the commit
notice. Could you please expand on why this is necessary?

static const char aSVGScript4[] =
 "\
+         else if( nIndex > nMax )\n\
+             return nMax;\n\
          else\n\
              return nIndex;\n\

and other places - the different splitting up into pieces looks
rather random - any chance to have that fixed? It makes patch 
review unnecessarily hard. In this case, I have to check lines and
lines of (seemingly) cruft - which really does not help to get a
quick review done, and may lead to your patch being postponed
because I get interrupted with other stuff.

@@ -1848,7 +1854,7 @@ static const char aSVGScript8[] =
              theSlideIndexPage.show();\n\
              currentMode = INDEX_MODE;\n\
          }\n\
-         else if (currentMode == INDEX_MODE)\n\
+         else if( currentMode == INDEX_MODE )\n\
          {\n\
              theSlideIndexPage.hide();\n\
              var nNewSlide = theSlideIndexPage.selectedSlideIndex;\n\

No prob with making indentation/whitespace consistent - but much
more helpful when reviewing, to have separate patches for that, with
a helpful comment mentioning "whitespace cleanup". ;)

Otherwise, looks good - thanks for the fixing! :)

Cheers,

-- Thorsten

Attachment: pgpooSYRru6jC.pgp
Description: PGP signature


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.