2011/8/18 Eike Rathke <ooo@erack.de>:
Hi Matúš,
On Monday, 2011-08-15 13:50:44 +0200, Matúš Kukan wrote:
I'm trying to build bigger libraries
What would be the benefit of that in this specific case?
I don't want to merge these two but also others always loaded
libraries in application
and later also start using link-time optimization,
all these things just if enabled.
but I have small problem with ItemHolder2.
It's implemented in svl/source/config/itemholder2.cxx and also in
svtools/source/config/itemholder2.cxx.
The one in svtools seems to be more general but svtools's library is
linking against the svl one.
They implement exclusively different sets regarding the items of the
configuration parts in {svl,svtools}/source/config/
Maybe history sheds some light here: svl was factored out from svtools
and contains the parts that do not need vcl. I think lumping them
together again actually is not a good idea.
Thanks for explaining, I decided to use namespace.
Matus
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.