Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Hi Lubos,

On Tue, 16 Aug 2011 12:09:19 +0200
Lubos Lunak <l.lunak@suse.cz> wrote:

 No, starmath doesn't need to call back to writer. The problem is
that this is still needlessly complicated. How about the attached
patch?

While it works, I would prefer if the 10.000-feet-view of the project
stays reasonably understandable as the codebase as is is already hard
enough to grok -- esp. for newcomers. One of the few sane structurings
of the codebase is:

 http://wiki.services.openoffice.org/wiki/Build_Environment_Effort/Dependencies#Office_modules

which certainly could use improvement, but tearing it down without
having resources and a good plan for a better structure is not a good
idea IMHO. So why not go with Caolans proposal?

Best,

Bjoern

-- 
https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen



Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.