On Fri, 12 Aug 2011 15:27:11 +0200
Bjoern Michaelsen
<bjoern.michaelsen@canonical.com> wrote:
It would remove the touch-target of the animations header (the empty
file that signals to the build system 'everything for the header
target is done'), yes -- but it would not remove the headers
themselves: It doesnt even know about them as they are declared in
animations. So apart from a few possible superfluous relinkings of
libs using the animations headers, everything is fine.
gb_Library_add_package_headers is the way to go.
OTOH, the packages are registered in the module anyway, so a "make
clean" in sd will remove the sd packages anyway. So maybe the
dependency of the LinkTarget clean target on the package clean target
can/should be removed anyway (thereby preventing the superfluous
relinking)?
Best,
Bjoern
--
https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen
Context
Privacy Policy |
Impressum (Legal Info) |
Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images
on this website are licensed under the
Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License.
This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is
licensed under the Mozilla Public License (
MPLv2).
"LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are
registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are
in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective
logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use
thereof is explained in our
trademark policy.