Re: [Libreoffice] SfxItemSet reimplementation (was: va_start without va_end)

Bjoern Michaelsen wrote:
> Hi Norbert, all,
>
> On Thu, 4 Aug 2011 20:47:43 -0500
> Norbert Thiebaud <nthiebaud@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > The va_end manpage, on linux says:
> > "Each invocation of va_start() must be matched by a corresponding
> > invocation of va_end() in the _same function_"
> >  (emphasis is mine)
> >  so it's not just ugly, but also 'wrong'...
>
> FWIW, I tried a clean new from the group up reimplementation of
> SfxItemset once in cws new_itemsets:
> ...
> Maybe somebody is interested in integrating the replacement Itemset? I
> added an EasyHack for it:
>  https://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=39849
> Although that is a truely challenging task, it would also be most
> rewarding.
>
> Best,
>
> Bjoern
>
>
> -- 
> https://launchpad.net/~bjoern-michaelsen
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> LibreOffice mailing list
> LibreOffice@lists.freedesktop.org
> http://lists.freedesktop.org/mailman/listinfo/libreoffice
I don't know if i can do this easyhack but what about the 3 cases of vm_end
? Should vm_end be added ?
If yes, i can commit and pushed them for the 2 first cases. For the third
case, i can also do it but I can't check before since it impacts above all
Windows parts and I compile on Linux.

Julien.

--
View this message in context: 
http://nabble.documentfoundation.org/va-start-without-va-end-tp3223648p3235171.html
Sent from the Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.