Date: prev next · Thread: first prev next last
2011 Archives by date, by thread · List index


Caolán McNamara píše v Út 28. 06. 2011 v 14:01 +0100:
On Tue, 2011-06-28 at 11:33 +0200, Alexander Thurgood wrote:
Could we not have a "nightly" tag ? Or if we do that, are
we going to have tag overkill like we did with OOo ?

Sounds like a good thing to have a different version than the catch-all
"unspecified", not sure who's got the power to add versions into the
list ? Petr ?

As per the other thread, new dailies should have build-ids in their
about dialog which are useful from a dev perspective to identify what
happens between a good daily and a bad daily, but those change
per-commit of course so best pasted into the body of a daily bug report
as free-form text.

One solutions would be to add something like this to the tinderbox
scripts:

    pull_date=`date`

    ./ pull -r

    ./autogen
[...]
    --with-build-version="Daily built at $pull_date"

Another solution would be to define a default value in the configure.in,
e.g.

    now=`date`
    BUILD_VER_STRING="Built at $now"

Someone mentioned that it would be better to mention the last commit id.
It is not easy with the many repositories. I would wait with this
approach for the single repo.


What do you think?

Best Regards,
Petr


Context


Privacy Policy | Impressum (Legal Info) | Copyright information: Unless otherwise specified, all text and images on this website are licensed under the Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0 License. This does not include the source code of LibreOffice, which is licensed under the Mozilla Public License (MPLv2). "LibreOffice" and "The Document Foundation" are registered trademarks of their corresponding registered owners or are in actual use as trademarks in one or more countries. Their respective logos and icons are also subject to international copyright laws. Use thereof is explained in our trademark policy.